My second meeting with the accountant for my organization was a no show as well, and I’ve heard that if you make an appointment twice and they don’t show up, then they don’t actually want to meet with you but they don’t know how to say no. I won’t really push it, but its too bad because I thought maybe the accounting would have been a good concrete way I could actually help my organization and at the same time maybe learn some stuff about how they work. For me numbers have more weight than abstract concepts, and since much of what is considered discussion of work is actually just repitition of what is written in mission statements and plans of action, they might be one of the only ways of actually getting an idea of what will happen.
But that’s a little overly pessimistic, and indeed I’m already learning some things that my organization does just by virtue of spending time there. I made plans to meet with my counterpart next week. We are going to talk about what they would like me to do and what I want to achieve while here. Hopefully it will be more productive than our previous conversations. Not that those have been bad, but I could have gained the same information from reading the plan of action (which I had already read).
Though I haven’t seen this directly because I haven’t actually watched a class, the education system is supposed to be quite different here, not just in terms of annual exams that have to be passed, but in terms of the style of teaching. It is based on rote repitition and memorization, and I don’t mean just memorization of capitals, but memorization of entire phrases of history, government, and sciences. Thus your success seems largely determined by how well you can recite passages from your text book, but there is little practice with problem solving or the extraction of information from those passages.
For example, I was asking a kid what he had learned at the AIDS seminar he went to, and he launched into a memorized passage of how AIDS compromises the human immune system. This doesn’t necessarily mean that he was just reciting and didn’t actually understand what he was saying, but it serves to illustrate how education here works.
Which is important because what I really wanted to mention is how frustrating it is to sit through conversations in which people are reading off of sheets of paper that everyone has. For me this seems like a giant waste of time, because we should be talking about the important information that is used to construct whatever it is we are reading, but it certainly doesn’t seem necessary to actually read the passages, which are filled with just as much fluff as a plan of action would be in the United States. But here being able to recite the actual passages in your plan of action is considered important, not just because that’s how my organization actually describes what they do, but because if someone asks you what the mission of your ONG is and you give an abbreviated version of it, they are likely to read it and then come back and hassle you for leaving out a word.
The emphasis on memorization transfers over into everyday social life as well. Sometimes kids will ask me a question that they already know the answer to, and regardless of whether I know the answer, they will launch into the appropriate passage. Or for Faisson Ensemble formations, the seminars seem to consist solely of reading passages out of the governance manual published by the Guinean government (and you can imagine how dry that document is).
All of this conflicts somewhat heavily with how I like to do presentations, and how I like to learn, which is a faster and looser discussion of ideas and important concepts, and if people what to revisite at what population the locally elected mayor iss allowed to have a second vice mayor, they can do that by referring to the document on their own time. I can tell already that when I get to the point that I’m giving trainings, on whatever topic, that I’m going to be expected to provide a lot more structure than I usually do.
Not that any of it matters right now. I spent the last several days studying French and going to the office for a couple of hours, but mostly reading John Grisham novels, Of which I’ve finished four since Monday. I am missing the opportunity for deep involved thought, which is limited both by my lack of command of French and my not having a lot of in depth stuff to do right now. But I just started Ayn Rand’s The Fountainhead, which is supposed to be pretty weighty.
   

