I know I still have a few months to go, but I’ve been compiling a list of things I want to bring with me. There are some restrictions, in that I’m limited to 80 lbs of checked luggage, and some height, width, depth measurement. But the biggest issue I’ve had so far is determining whether some things are a good idea in terms of the image they present.
For example, some of the forums have discussions about sunglasses. Sunglasses typify a larger issue; mainly what walking into an extremely poor community with $120 sunglasses says. I think many PCVs are tied to the idea of Peace Corps service as an adventure, and they want all the trappings of an adventurous trip. Then there is also the valid argument of UV protection for your eyes. I am not innocent of this.
The same question presents itself for clothing, backpacks, watches, sandals, shoes, etc… if we arrive looking like a walking REI catalog, what does that do to our credibility?
The idea of living in a community with gear that is outrageously beyond their income level bothers me. Does it contribute to the image that community members might have of rich Americans? If so, does our image as rich Americans signify to them that we are not really involved in our work, whatever that might be? Many volunteers in tourist areas have problems convincing the locals that they aren’t just there for vacation. This seems to be worse in the Caribbean, where so much of foreign travel is for tourist reasons. I suspect the ‘adventure gear’ contributes pretty significantly to the problem.
On the other hand, I fully believe in the usefulness of a laptop and any other tools of the trade. Where to draw the distinction? What qualifies as useful versus merely fulfilling an image? On The Decision Strategist, I’ve often talked about the idea that we have stories and metaphors that we like to tell about ourselves, and that we buy things to fulfill that image. What is valid gear and what is over the top? For example, do Chacos represent a sensible alternative to shoes in a climate that is very warm and humid (I sweat profusely)? Or are they only worn by tourists as they walk along the beach? Is a watch useful as an alarm clock and timepiece, or is it another showpiece in an attempt to fit an image?
I plan, at the very least, on bringing some sandals and running/hiking shoes (Chacos or Tevas), a watch, a laptop, a camera, lots of SD memory cards, possibly a GPS unit (mapping is fun!), my headlamp, climbing shoes, backpack, and water filter.
From the beginning I want to emphasize to my community that my goal for being there is to work with them (and learn from them). But I want to have fun too, which means at least occasionally exploring the surrounding mountains and oceans.
My hope, and I think it’s true, is that actions speak louder than belongings. I could show up without anything I listed above, and spend every day (for example) drinking and hanging out as much as possible, and convey a much less serious attitude to my community than if I bring expensive gear and demonstrate a strong desire to work (though I’m sure my definition of that word will be challenged).
I guess in the end its all part of adapting to a new culture and living standard, but I’d prefer my first impression to be a positive one, rather than have to make headway against an initial reputation as a tourist.
Let me finish by saying I don’t mean to judge what anyone is bringing or not bringing, this is just something I’ve been thinking about with respect to my own packing list.